INDIA-AMERICA-BRITISH

WELCOME TO KATY INDIA- ALL THE ARTICLES WRITTEN BY LOKANATH MISHRA ON INDIAN-AMERICAN -BRITISH - SOCIAL AND CULTURAL MATTERS ARE BEING RE PRODUCED IN THIS BLOG POST
LORD SHRI JAGANNATH & LORD SHRI KRISHNA ARE MAHA VISHNU.SHRI JAGANNATH IS BEING WORSHIPED THROUGHOUT THE WORLD.

Wednesday, 30 May 2018

Harassment by GST State Authorities to honest Tax Payers.

Harassment by State Authorities to honest Tax Payers.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The All Odisha Indirect Tax Legal Consultants' Association ( AOITLCA) has expressed serious concern over growing trend of sending of scrutiny notices by the different GST authorities of State Government to asseessees for mismatch between tax payments and final sales return even before the whole process of tax liabilities is completed under the GST rules and regulations.
In a statement, it said assessees are being issued notices by different State authorities to explain mismatches of details in GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B for the same period.
"The State Governments authorities issuing such notices fail to appreciate that GSTR-3B requires self assessed detail of tax liability and the ITC whereas in GSTR-1, the assesee is required to give invoice-wise details of sales. Such a notice is highly premature particularly in view of the fact that Forms GSTR-2 and GSTR-3 have been extended indefinitely. Form GSTR-3B is only an interim measure and returns are to be finalized only after filing GSTR-2 and GSTR-3, " said Lokanath Mishra , President ( AOITLCA).
Not only this, the assessees are not getting even 30 days time to respond to these notices as mandated under GST law.
Mishra said under the existing GST rules the tax authorities do not have to take cognisance of GSTR-2A till the process of tax reconciliation is finalised.
Presently only companies have to file GSTR-1 and GSTR-3B. The process of reconciliation between GSTR-2A and GSTR-3B is yet to be finalised by the GST authorities, Mishra said.
Therefore, Mishra said, there is no need for tax authorities to send mismatch scrutiny notices at this point in time.
Till the final process of reconciliation is put in place by the tax authorities, sending of scrutiny notices for mismatch in GST returns will cause unwaranted and avoidable harassment to taxpayers, Mishra said. It is totally harassment by different State Authorities. Mishra said at initial stage all the Assessees should be placed under Center control instead of placing them under State Government Authorities. Central Agencies are being performed their work as per the provisions of statute without harassing tax payers , Mishra said in a press Statement.


Directorate of Revenue Intelligence seizes huge quantity of Tramadol, a psychotropic substance, worth crores of rupees from a factory in Palghar near Mumbai.

Rs 50 crore 'fighter drug' used by ISIS terrorists seized - & Stepping up its counter-terror efforts in North-East, DRI in a joint op with Assam Rifles, seized a consignment of AK-47s at Aizwal, being smuggled from Myanmar.

  1. Stepping up its counter-terror efforts in North-East, DRI in a joint op with Assam Rifles, seized a consignment of AK-47s at Aizwal, being smuggled from Myanmar. 5 persons arrested & charged under Arms Act & Customs Act. I thank Assam Rifles for their assistance
     
  2. Rs 50 crore 'fighter drug' used by ISIS terrorists seized -  

Tuesday, 29 May 2018

Four Years Of Modi: Four Key Tax Trends


As beginnings go it was the most auspicious. In his first full Union Budget speech in 2015, Finance Minister Arun Jaitley said all the right things about expanding India’s tax base and raising tax buoyancy. He also promised two concrete measures to modernise India’s tax system—on direct taxes he promised companies a lower rate, from 30 percent to 25 percent, and no exemptions; and on indirect tax he promised to roll out a Goods and Services Tax.
Both were aimed at simplifying a complex architecture beset with leakage and evasion on the one hand and double taxation on the other. Four years on, Jaitley has delivered only partially on both promises.
The headline corporate tax rate has reduced but only for small and medium enterprises with a turnover of up to Rs 250 crore. The finance minister said that covered 99 percent of all companies paying their taxes. That’s true, but according to government data these companies’ contribution is estimated at 35 percent of total corporate tax revenue, maybe even less.
Also, India’s dual GST with four rate slabs and a few cesses has been an implementation nightmare and still is a work in progress.
And yet, the finance minister can add two feathers to his cap—that of higher tax buoyancy and a tax base expansion. On two other grounds Modi’s four years have brought little cheer.

1. Finally, More People Are Paying Tax In India!

India’s tax-to-gross domestic product ratio increased from 10.2 percent to 11.6 percent in the last four years. The estimate for the current financial year 2018-19 is 12.1 percent. If achieved, it will mark a record as the highest so far has been 11.9 percent in 2007-08. Then the tax buoyancy was 1.5 times, that is tax revenue collection growth was 1.5 times that of GDP growth. By 2013-14, it had slipped to below one. This year it has recovered to 1.2, mostly on the back of strong growth in personal income tax collections, which saw a buoyancy of 2.11 as per the revised estimates of 2017-18.
This is good news as otherwise India ranks at the bottom when compared to other countries such as Denmark that, as per 2016 data, had the highest tax-to-GDP ratio of 45.9 percent. It would not augur well if this was achieved on a static taxpayer base: that is same number of people paid more tax. The real achievement here then is an expansion of the tax base, both in terms of those who pay direct taxes such as income tax and those who pay indirect taxes such as GST.
In this year’s Union Budget speech, Jaitley said the number of taxpayers had increased from 6.47 crore at the beginning of financial year 2014-15 to 8.27 crore at the end of financial year 2016-17.
That’s an increase of 1.8 crore over three financial years or about 60 lakh new taxpayers every year. Compare that with an addition of 45 lakh taxpayers on average per year between FY12 and FY15, as per Income Tax Department data.
Not surprisingly, the big jump seems to have come after the implementation of demonetisation and amnesty schemes. Though to be clear, the lack of one source of comprehensive taxpayer data and conflicting commentary by government officials makes this an exercise in approximations and assumptions.
"In financial year 2016-17, 85.51 lakh new taxpayers filed their returns of income as against 66.26 lakh in the immediately preceding year." - Arun Jaitley, Finance Minister (Budget 2018)
GST helped expand the indirect tax base by at least 50 percent. The Economic Survey 2017-18, presented in January, estimated that of the then 98 lakh GST registrants, 34 lakh were new taxpayers.
Since then, the total number of registrants under GST has increased to just over one crore. Curiously though just under 70 percent or so are filing taxes. Whether that’s due to technical difficulties or adoption delays or other reasons is tough to tell. But it does cloud the base expansion data.

2. Indirect Tax Skew Worsens

A heavy-handed GST has also meant that India’s reliance on indirect tax revenue has remained unchanged over Modi’s term. In fact government data suggests, it has marginally worsened.
Direct taxes contributed over 56 percent to gross tax revenues in FY14. In FY17 that fell to just over 49 percent, recovering to 51 percent last year.
Customs at IGI recovered 4000 gms gold bars worth Rs. 1.2 crores on 28.05.2018 during the rummaging of flight no. AI-383

A very small association namely -" All India Passport Employees Association"- has started its agitational programme in a very novel way such as observing Munadan Ceremony, Fasting etc. But strong associations of CBIC are unable to observe such type of agitations as members of these strong associations of CBIC are not dedicated and united.


As per its call, the All India Passport Employees Association  had organised their scheduled programme of Mundan Ceremony in front of Regional Passport office, R.K. Puram, New Delhi on 28th May 2018. Three leaders of the Association shall sit for infinite fast from tomorrow 11.55 am in front Regional passport Office, R.K. Puram, New Delhi.


  
To be published in the Gazette of India, Extraordinary, Part II, Section 3, Sub-section (i)]
Government of India
Ministry of Finance
Department of Revenue
Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs
Notification No. 24 /2018 – Central Tax
New Delhi, the 28th May, 2018
G.S.R. … (E).- In exercise of the powers conferred by section 48 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (12 of 2017) read with sub-rule (3) of rule 83 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017, the Commissioner, on the recommendations of the Council, hereby notifies the National Academy of Customs, Indirect Taxes and Narcotics, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance, Government of India, as the authority to conduct the examination as per the said sub-rule.
[F. No.349/58/2017-GST(Pt.)]
(Dr. Sreeparvathy S.L.)
Under Secretary to the Government of India

Monday, 28 May 2018

Even after 11 months, SEZ Rules not aligned with GST laws



It is almost 11 months since the Goods and Services Tax (GST) came into being. Yet, the necessary consequential changes have not been made in the Special Economic Zones (SEZ) Act, 2005, or the SEZ Rules, 2006.

There is no mention of GST in either. References to the repealed laws for service tax, purchase tax, etc, continue in the SEZ laws.
For example,  Section 26 (e) of the SEZ Act still says every developer and entrepreneur shall be entitled to exemption from service tax under Chapter V of the Finance Act, 1994 (32 of 1994) on taxable services provided to a developer or unit to carry on the authorised operations in a SEZ.

Similarly, Section 26 (f) and (g) of this Act talk of security transaction tax and purchase tax.
Similarly so with the SEZ Rules, 2006. Somebody needs to tell the commerce ministry that with the advent of GST laws, many levies such as service tax have ceased to exist.
The SEZ laws also still treat Export Oriented Units (EOUs) as bonded warehouses. For procurement of goods from an EOU, Rule 30 (14) of the SEZ Rules requires the SEZ unit to file a bill of entry and the EOU to file an ex-bond shipping bill.
Such procedures ceased to apply from August 13, 2016, when EOUs were de-licensed as bonded warehouses.
Since then, EOUs send goods to other EOUs under the same procedures other DTA (Domestic Tariff Area) units follow.
Even the Foreign Trade Policy has been amended to give effect to these changes.
However, officials dealing with the SEZ laws in the commerce ministry seem unaware of the developments.
The SEZ laws talk only of central excise duty in case of supplies from the DTA to an SEZ.
At present, excise duty is limited to select petroleum products, tobacco and tobacco products.
All other items attract GST.  The SEZ laws should reflect this position but the ministry seems oblivious to that requirement.
Section 26 of the SEZ Act lists various exemptions available to SEZ units and developers.
Since this does not exempt Integrated GST (IGST) on goods imported into an SEZ, the finance ministry issued notification 64/2017-Cus dated July 5, 2017, exempting IGST on import into an SEZ.
The SEZ Rules still mention the Duty Entitlement Passbook and supplies against a Duty Free Replenishment Certificate -- these schemes were abolished long before.
And, many other provisions in Rule 53 on deemed export are not in sync with provisions in the current Foreign Trade Policy.
To align the SEZ Rules with the GST laws, and to remove the various related difficultie, a committee under the chairmanship of L B Singhal, development commissioner at the Noida SEZ, was constituted by the commerce ministry to review the Rules and make recommendations.
The committee gave its report and stakeholders were requested to go through these and send their comments by end-December, 2017.
Nothing seems to have happened after that. The commerce ministry should now wake up and suitably amend the SEZ laws.
DRI seized 24 pcs of ivory tusks in Guwahati, to be smuggled to Nepal and arrested 2 persons. It is suspected that 5 adult and sub-adult elephants might have been killed in Assam to extract these tusks. DRI is committed to combating wildlife crime.

Sunday, 27 May 2018

No proposal is under consideration to abolish system of Pay Commission in future.

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA 
MINISTRY OF FINANCE 
 
LOK SABHA
STARRED QUESTION NO: 568
ANSWERED ON: 06.04.2018


Pay Commission Reports


Question
*568. JOSE K. MANI 
Will the Minister of FINANCE be pleased to state:- 

(a) whether the reports of successive Pay Commissions have been increasing the burden on Government finances/ exchequer in partially accepting their recommendations for increase in wages and if so, the details thereof;

(b) whether the last Pay Commission has suggested productivity linked pay hike to the deserving employees to eliminate below average or mediocre performance and if so, the details thereof;

(c) whether such periodic hikes in wages resulting from Pay Commission recommendations trigger similar demands from the State Government/public utility employees, imposing burden on already strained State finances and if so, the details thereof; and

(d) whether the Government is considering an alternative for increasing the salaries and allowances of Central Government employees and pensioners in future instead of forming Pay Commission and if so, the details thereof?

ANSWER

MINISTER OF STATE IN THE MINISTRY OF FINANCE (SHRI P. RADHAKRISHNAN) 

(a) The financial impact of the recommendations of the Central Pay Commission, as accepted by the Government, is normally more pronounced in the initial year and gradually it tapers off as the growth in the economy picks up and fiscal space is widened. While implementing the recommendations of the last Central Pay Commission, i.e., the Seventh Central Pay Commission, the Government staggered its implementation in two financial years. While the recommendations on pay and pension were implemented with effect from 01.01.2016, the recommendations in respect of allowances have been implemented with effect from 01.07.2017 after an examination by a Committee. This has moderated the financial impact of the recommendations. Moreover, unlike the previous 6th Pay Commission, which entailed substantial impact on account of arrears, the impact in the year 2016-17 on account of element of arrears of revised pay and pension on the present occasion of the 7th Central Pay Commission pertained to only 2 months of the previous financial year of 2015-16.

(b) The Seventh Central Pay Commission in Para 5.1.46 of its Report proposed withholding of annual increment in the case of those employees who are not able to meet the benchmark either for Modified Assured Career Progression (MACP) or regular promotion within the first 20 years of their service.

(c) The service conditions of employees of State Governments fall within the exclusive domain of the respective State Governments who are federally independent of the Central Government. Therefore, the concerned State Governments have to independently take a view in the matter.

(d) No such proposal is under consideration of the Government.
Non-issue of Pension slip by banks

CPAO/1T&Tech/Bank Performance/37 (Vol III)/2018-19/23

Dated: 15.05.2018

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Subject: Non-issue of Pension slip by banks.

Attention is invited to para 4.6.6 of CPPC Guidelines issued by CPAO whereby it has been mentioned that “The Home Branch will meet all information needs of the pensioner using the CPPC system. The CPPC software will display on the computer screen, options and view of the details of calculation of pension and its breakup of the pension paid to the pensioner/ family pensioner. The Home Branch will act as intermediary between the pensioner & CPPC and, besides providing accounts statement, provide to the pensioners the TDS, pension slip, the Due and Drawn Statement in respect of each arrear and the Annual Income Statement”.

In view of the above, Heads of CPPCs and Heads of Government Business Divisions of all the authorized banks are requested to strictly adhere to the above mentioned provision of para 4.6.6 of the CPPC guidelines.

This issues with the approval of Chief Controller (Pensions)

sd/-
(Praful Dabral)
Sr. Accounts Officer (IT & Tech)

Saturday, 26 May 2018

Central Government Employees Group Insurance Scheme 1980 - Tables of Benefits for the savings fund for the period from 1.4.2018 to 30.06.2018 (Click the link below to view)

The Pre-2006 Pensioners be given the benefit of upgraded Pay Band and Grade Pay of the post from which they retired so that minimum pension be not lower than 50% of the pay in the revised pay band plus the grade pay corresponding to the post from which the pensioner retired . Hence if any one facing any difficulties , please report immediately.

1. Sixth Pay Commission had Merged and upgraded some posts keeping in view their duties & responsibilities. The recommendations of the Sixth CPC were accepted by the Government vide Resolution of the Government Notified on 29-8-2008 and orders were issued thereon vide DOPT & DOPPW vide OMs dated 1-9-2008.

2. DOP&PW subsequently modified these orders vide O.M. File No. 38/37/08-P&PW (A) dated 11-2-2009 and ordered that the benefit of upgrading of posts by Sixth Pay Commission shall not be given for the fixation of Revised Pension of Pre-2006 Pensioners.

3. Above cited orders of DOP&PW (dated 11-2-2009) had been quashed by the various Courts including the Apex Court, which inter-alia directed that “The fixation (of Pension) … will be subject to the provision that the revised pension, in no case, shall be lower than 50% of the sum of the minimum of the pay in the pay band and the grade pay thereon corresponding to the pre-revised pay scale from which the pensioner had retired.” DOP&PW issued the orders thereon vide OM dated 1-9-2008.

4. DOP&PW vide OM No.38/37/08-P&PW(A) Dated 30th July, 2015, in compliance with the judicial pronouncements, had decided that the pension/family pension of all pre-2006 pensioners/family pensioners may be revised in accordance with this Department’s OM No.38/37/08-P&PW(A) dated 28.1.2013 with effect from 1.1.2006.

5. Para 5 of DOPPW OM dated 11-2-2009 had specifically been quashed by various Courts –including the High Court of New Delhi in WP(C) 3035/2016 dated 3-8-2016 in Ram Phal-vs-Union of India & Ors and CAT Bangalore in CP 237/2015 in OA 231/2013 (Parthasarthy-Vs-Union of India).

6. High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam had held as under in OP (CAT).No. 169 of 2015 (Z) in its judgment dated 18th January, 2016 UNION OF INDIA vs N.R.PURUSHOTHAMAN PILLAI: “The resultant position that emerges from the pronouncement of the Central Administrative Tribunal as well as the different High Courts and the Apex Court is that, computation of pension in the matter of implementation of the 6th Pay Commission Report has to be at 50% of the pay scale with respect to the scale of pay applicable to the post in question and not to the corresponding scale of pay to the one at which the incumbent has retired.”

7. Regrettably the benefit of upgrading of posts was still not given to the Pre-2006 Pensioners in spite of the above cited judgments of various Courts. The benefit of the Court judgments on this had been restricted only to the Petitioners and not to other similarly placed Pre-2006 Pensioners.
8. This is totally discriminatory and violates Article 14 of the Constitution as well as under the settled law that the decisions taken in one specific case either by the Judiciary or the Govt. should be applied to all other similar cases without forcing the other employees or pensioners to approach the court of law for an identical remedy or relief.

9. Delhi High Court in W.P.(C) 8012/2013 had held that “policy decision of the Government in the OM dated September 01, 2008 to fix pension for all categories of pensioners did not classify post of pre January 01, 2006 retirees and all were entitled to pension as per a common formula”
10. It is, therefore, the Pre-2006 Pensioners be given the benefit of upgraded Pay Band and Grade Pay of the post from which they retired so that minimum pension be not lower than 50% of the pay in the revised pay band plus the grade pay corresponding to the post from which the pensioner retired – as per DOPPW OM dated 30-7-2015.

IT department releases all e-filing forms for AY 2018-19, last date for filing is July 31 Among these, ITR-1 or Sahaj is to be used by individual taxpayers who happen to be salaried employees in organisations


The Income Tax department has released all the e-filing forms for the assessment year 2018-19, and has set the last date for filing income tax returns at  July 31.

All the forms are available for download on the income tax department's official website.
The Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) had started releasing new forms for Income Tax Returns (ITR) only last month. Depending on the category under which a taxpayer falls -- individual taxpayer, HUF, partnership, or firm -- the forms are classed as ITR 1,2,3,4,5,6 and 7.
Among these, ITR-1 or Sahaj is to be used by individual taxpayers who are salaried employees in organisations.
CBDT had earlier said that these forms had been made simpler, though the process of filing ITR remains the same.
The board had also said that individual taxpayers who turned 80-years-old or more at any time during the previous year, or an individual or HUF whose income does not exceed Rs 5 lakh and who has not claimed any refund, can file ITR in the paper form.
This could be done using the ITR-1 or ITR-4 forms.
Customs & CGST Inspector & presently Intelligence Officer in DRI, Ms. Sudesna Sengupta’s life is nothing short of an exciting thriller, apt for a biopic.

From busting a syndicate of 10 companies involved in the illegal import of ready garments to curbing the unlawful export of Red Sanders and Indian star Tortoises and seizing 335 kg of ganja, she has done it all!

The first step for her team was to gather intel (information). They then decided to kickstart the operation at 1 a.m. in hired vehicles, because they were aware the smuggler’s henchmen were in every nook and corner of Maslandapur, West Bengal.

Speaking to the Hindustan Times, the gutsy officer recalls the story of how despite her team’s suggestions to stay back, she decided to lead the raid from the front.

“His hideout had multiple exits. At 4:30 a.m. we reached an opening where we had to enter from an iron grill below the door. Barely dogs could pass through it. I could not have missed this chance. I went inside with my partner (IO) Sudeb Sarkar and arrested the accused. Our every raid is a plot for a movie,” she told the publication.

But everything is not as rosy as you would see it on the silver screen. Despite facing several death threats, as well as warnings to hurt her family, especially her two children, the brave officer stood undeterred.

“I have faced direct threats like, ‘If I am out of custody even God can’t save you!’ After release from judicial custody, people are required to report to DRI and have to deal with intelligence officers. In one of the cases of smuggling from Myanmar, the accused whispered to me, ‘your boy is in this school…your husband works here…you live in this area’…my past dating back to 10 years…so sometimes it’s very disturbing. But, nowadays I don’t care! Still, when family comes into picture…it’s surely challenging!” she says.

She remembers how at the beginning of her service, she would only be summoned for assignments which involved female accused. But it was a year before she could prove herself. Today, even if the clock strikes twelve, and her phone rings, summoning her for a raid, the fiery officer is set to take it on.

But a few manual challenges continue to persist, “Especially, when an equivalent amount of strength and energy is required like a male. For example, leading an operation to examine a 40-ft container at Kolkata port that takes 20-36 hours, working with labourers and taking all recordings is very excruciating. Another challenge is when your kids are ill, and you have to report to duty,” she told HT.

Originally from the city of joy, #Kolkata, she completed her BSc in Geography from Calcutta University and a PG in Human Rights from IIHR, New Delhi. She joined the Customs & Indirect Taxes (#CBIC), as an Inspector in 2010 and works as an Intelligence Officer in the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (#DRI).

The DRI operates to crack smuggling or trafficking activities (of contraband goods or #narcotics), illegal under-invoicing and any anti-national economic rackets across the length and breadth of the country.

Some of her key cases involve a UP railway syndicate which runs 8-10 fraud companies. It is infamous for importing ready-made garments from China by declaring the goods undervalued, thus evading customs duty.

As part of another raid, the officer’s team seized 12 kg of smuggled gold biscuits of foreign origin from a syndicate of Varanasi. Although the UP-based mastermind behind the case had fled, he was later nabbed in #Guwahati.

She was also a part of the DRI team that cracked down on 13 cases of smuggled goods worth Rs. 193 crore which was seized at the Kolkata airport.

Friday, 25 May 2018

July DA Calculator - Expected DA from July 2018
Click here to See
GPF INTEREST RATE FROM 1st APRIL 2018
Air India LTC 80 Fare from 1st April 2018
Imprtant Service Matters and DOPT Orders in February 2018
Click here to See
Revised 7th CPC Pay Matrix
GPF Interest rate from 1st January 2018
Children Education Allowance Certificate Format
KV 1st Standard Admission Selected List Declaration dates latest updates
7th CPC Latest Calculators
LTC Air India Fare from January 2018
Click here to See
Pre 2016 Pension Arrears calculator
House Building Advance Rules (HBA) 2017 and Instructions
LTC Block Years and Carry Forward LTC in 2018


Pension Procedure Latest updates

PENSION PROCEDURE

(1) What is the meaning of the following terms?
(a) Pension Disbursing Authority
(b) Pension Sanctioning Authority
(c) PPO Issuing Authority
Pension Procedure
(2) What should a Government servant do to claim his pension?
During service each Govt. servant should satisfy himself that service is being verified and recorded so in the service book and that there are no gaps in this. He should also ensure that nomination for all payments due to him are current and valid.
Six months prior to the retirement date, a Government servant is required to furnish certain information (e.g. joint photo with spouse, family details, name of the branch of the authorized bank through which he desires to draw his pension etc.) to his Head of Office in the prescribed Form No. 5.
The Head of Office is required to undertake the work of preparation of pension papers in Form No. 7 one year before the date on which a Government servant is due to retire on superannuation. After complying with the requirements of CCS Pension Rules 59 & 60, the Head of Office has to forward to the Pay & Accounts Officer Form 5 and Form 7 duly completed with a covering letter in Form 8 along with service book of the Government servant duly completed up-to-date and any other documents relied upon for the verification of service, not later than six months before the date of retirement of the Government servant.
(3) Who is to authorize the pension?
On receipt of pension papers from Head of Office, the Pay & Accounts Officer concerned will, after applying requisite checks, assess the amount of pension and issue the Pension Payment Order (both halves of Pension Payment Order, i.e. disburser’s portion and pensioner’s portion) not later than one month in advance of the date of retirement of the Government servant with forwarding authority letter, duly ink signed and embossed, to Central Pension Accounting Office (CPAO) who in turn will generate on computer a Special Seal Authority on the basis of details given in the Pension Payment Order and authority letter of the Pay & Accounts Officer and forward disburser’s half of PPO with Special Seal Authority to the Central Pension Processing Centre (CPPC) of the concerned authorized Bank. The Pay & Accounts officer after ascertaining that the special seal of authority has been issued shall send pensioners’ half of PPO to be handed over to the retiring employee. However, if the employee opts to take the PPO from bank, both halves shall be sent to CPAO. All records will be maintained in the CPPC and the disbursing branch, will make the payments to the pensioner on authorization of payment of pension by the CPPC. The CPPC however is only the back office for processing pensions, all pension related problems/grievances of the pensioners will continue to be handled by the concerned paying branch as before.
(4) What is to be done in case the pension has not been fixed correctly?
The Pay & Accounts Officer while issuing the pension authorization will forward one copy of the pension calculation sheet (out of three received by him from the Head of Office) as certified by the Head of Office and countersigned by him (Pay & Accounts Officer) to the pensioner along with the intimation of his having sent the pension payment authority/PPO to the CPAO. In case it is found from the pension calculation sheet that pension has been fixed incorrectly, the matter may be taken-up with the Head of Office. PAO concerned, if necessary, will issue an amendment authority letter to Central Pension Accounting Office for onward transmission to the CPPC to carry out
necessary amendments in both halves of PPO.
Pension Policy FAQ – Read 
Qualifying Service for Pension and Gratuity  FAQ  Read
Commutation of Pension Latest FAQ – Read
Fixed Medical Allowance and Amount FAQ – Read
Source : DoPPW
7th CPC Minimum Pay Increase
GPF Interest Rate from April 2018
Central Government Employees Orders March 2018
Central Government Employees Orders March 2018
July 2018 DA Calculator
July 2018 DA Calculator
Gratuity Ceiling Increase came into force from 29th March 2018
LTC to Railway employees
LTC to Railway employees
LTC Block Year Grace Period
LTC Block Year Grace Period
Increase in 7th CPC Minimum Pay and Fitment Factor
Increase in 7th CPC Minimum Pay and Fitment Factor